Executive Compensation to the People

There is a bill in the progress before the House of Representatives that is trying to put the issue of the pay and compensation package that executives of publicly traded companies receive in front of stockholders. This bill is actually expected to pass through the house successfully; however, it is unclear how well the Senate will receive it. Is this bill the right direction for a modern America, or do we need to consider more intimately the economic implications of such a decision?

The White House has already formally registered its opposition to such a plan, however the backers are unconcerned. Many feel that the compensation plans of the major officers of the publicly traded companies should be tied to the performance of the company and the officers themselves, and not to the figures that the officers wish to receive.

This bill if passed could place an enormous amount of power into the hands of stockholders who are upset with the way several companies have behaved lately, with declining profits and horrible business practices while the officers of the companies have picked up large compensation packages that include their salary, benefits, and stock options. Each officer can end up with hundreds if not thousands in profits even while the company is performing badly, which stockholders believe is an inequitable outcome.

Many have wondered if the officers in charge of these companies would tighten the belts on spending if their own pay was tied to their performance rather than their wishes, and with numerous companies falling short of profits with huge pay packages going out, and raises occurring almost yearly many investors have started complaining loudly.

While current President Bush has urged the officers of the companies to step up and take responsibility. He has also said that it is not an issue that the government should become involved in. How far should the government extend into a private business? How many people would really feel comfortable with the idea of having the government determine what their pay could be? Most Americans can agree that they would not like the idea of the government interfering with their job and pays.

At the same time, while most Americans do not wish to have the government intruding into their jobs and careers, many still want some measures put into place to hold the executives accountable who are responsible for multi-million and multi-billion companies that employ hundreds to thousands of people.

Many have argued that the concept is nothing new; it is similar to ideas that are currently in place in countries such as Sweden, Australia and even in Britain. With examples such as those to follow, it makes people wonder if this actually does have the chance to pass through the House of Representatives and the Senate once the voting time has arrived.

With time as the key factor, there is scheduled to be a vote on the issue in the House of Representatives in the very near future, which is very much expected to pass without much opposition. It is the next step in the Senate that is where it starts getting sticky with people unsure of the results once the voting in the Senate starts. However, with increasing support from the people, many of whom work for companies affected by this issue, there is scope for a mass political influence, which will certainly make the outcome interesting.

Posted in |

All On For Dental Implants In Westlake Village

If you’re a denture user, you understand the pains of having one. Whether or not you have one right now, there’s a solution for restoring your missing teeth without all the harsh negatives. Introducing the All-on-4 dental implants procedure! The All-on-4 technique has been trending in the dental field for the last twenty years, and there is no end to its growing popularity for many more to come. With as little as four dental implants, you can enjoy a full prosthetic that looks and functions like natural teeth. In this article, we want to breakdown the benefits of choosing All-on-4 dental implants in Westlake Village, and where you can find affordable treatment in the same area.

Same Day Dental Implants are the Future of Dentistry

All-on-4 dental implants consists of using 4 dental implants. Dental implants, if you did not know, are the number one solution for replacing a single missing tooth and are well respected for their reliability, naturalness, and ease of care. So how does 4 dental implants replace an entire arch of teeth? The four dental implants are split into pairs. One pair is placed in the anterior portion of the jawbone, perpendicular to the thickest portion of the jaw that supports the most weight. The remaining pair are placed further back in the mouth, slightly angled inward near the back of the jawbone where your missing or extracted molars once were. The dentist makes small threaded incisions into the jawbone where each dental implant will be placed, and if there’s no complications will proceed to surgically insert each of the dental implants all in one day. Upon the completion of placing all 4 dental implants, the dentist will prepare a special temporary prosthetic to be used while your new dental implants are given 4-6 months to heal. After the healing period, the dentist will follow up with you and create a newer prosthetic that will cap your dental implants and become a permanent fixture in your mouth.

While the entire procedure may take some time, it’s certainly worth it over dealing with a contemporary denture that will only cause further problems and more issues for you and your dentist to deal with in the future. All-on-4 dental implants is truly the way to go to restore all of your teeth without worries!

The Benefits of Choosing All-on-4 Dental Implants

Getting All-on-4 dental implants is much more than getting back at dentures. There’s an esthetic advantage to getting All-on-4 as it is color matched to the remainder of any healthy natural teeth on the opposing arch. All-on-4 also helps preserve the jawbone, keeping you from having a sunken face in lapsing years. Moreover, your prosthetic never needs to be removed, meaning it’s also secure in place inside your mouth. You’ll never have to worry about slippage or sticky adhesives ever again! Having All-on-4 dental implants also means you can eat whatever you wish to once more! With dentures you have a mere 30% chewing retention in comparison to natural teeth, All-on-4 raises that percentage to an incredulous 90%. That’s a number a lot of people who already have gotten All-on-4 dental implants have smiled about.

Dental Implant Restorations In Long Beach

Chances are you have previously heard of dental implants, whether in newspapers, online, or by word of mouth. If you have not, dental implants are the leading solution for replacing missing teeth. Over 600,000 thousand people this past year have gotten dental implant restorations, and the success rate is over 98%. The hype over dental implants is underrated; dental implants have many benefits you can take advantage of if you are missing one or multiple teeth.

Advantages of Dental Implants

When you look at the advantages dental implants impose, you’ll see there’s no better solution than them. If you’re interested in an aesthetic solution, one that looks and feels like natural teeth, choose dental implants. In addition, through a process called osseointegration, dental implants fuse to the jawbone limiting further health issues caused by missing teeth. Next, dental implants retain 90% of your chewing ability, in comparison to dentures or bridges which only allow for 50% retention. Lastly, you’ll feel confident every day when waking up to your smile in the mirror. No longer will you have to worry about distancing yourself at social functions or family gatherings, but instead spend time with your friends and family.

What’s next? Now that you know the advantages of dental implants, we’re going to show you the price of dental implants in Long Beach, California.

Cost of Dental Implants in Long Beach, California

Many people believe dental implants are pricey, but that’s only if you’re looking in the wrong places. Moreover, no one wants to spend countless hours in waiting rooms attempting to compare implant prices from every specialist in Long Beach. So we did the work for you! We have contacted well over 500 dentist who specialize in dental implants, and we want to show you how affordable dental implants can be.

According to the most recent census, approximately 473,500 people reside in Long Beach. Divide this number by the 548 registered dentist in the city of Long Beach, you got about 864 patients per dentist. That’s a lot! Of course, not everyone needs dental implants. As such, dentist have to compete against each other, campaigning to be everyone’s go-to dentist for implant restorations. Thanks to this competition, dental implants are as low as $1495 per implant. Dentist benchmark themselves at the prices they believe their service is worth, which is why you’ll still find some asking for as much as $5000 per dental implant. However, the goal isn’t to spend more money on dental implants. If you’re looking for affordable dental implants, you’re in the right place.

Natural Law vs. Positivism

The philosophy of law is a complex and in depth study, which requires an intimate knowledge of the legal process in general as well as a philosophical mind. For centuries, the scope and nature of law has been debated and argued from various view points, and intense intellectual discussion has arisen from the fundamental question of ‘what is law’. In response, several major schools of thought have been born, of which the natural law scholars and positivists are two of the most notable. These two camps hold strictly contrasting views over the role and function of law in certain circumstances, and have provided in themselves platforms for criticism and debated which continue to be relevant today.

Although the classifications of natural law and positivism are frequently used, it is important to remember that they cover a very wide range of academic opinion. Even within each camp, there are those veering towards more liberal or more conservative understandings, and there is also naturally a grey area. Having said that, academics and philosophers can be enveloped by one of the categories on the basis of certain fundamental principles within their writings and opinions.

Natural law has always been linked to ultra-human considerations, that is to say a spiritual or moral influence determinant of their understandings of the way law operates. One of the founding principles is that an immoral law can be no law at all, on the basis that a government needs moral authority to be able to legislate. For this reason, natural law theories have been used to justify anarchy and disorder at ground level. This had lead to widespread criticism of the natural law principles, which have had to be refined and developed to fit with modern thinking. On the flip side, natural law has been used as a definitive method of serving ‘justice’ to war criminals and former-dictators after their reign.

Some of the strongest criticisms of natural law have come from the positivist camp. Positivism holds at its centre the belief that law is not affected by morality, but in essence is the source of moral considerations. Because morality is a subjective concept, positivism suggests that the law is the source of morality, and that no extra-legal considerations should be taken in to account. Positivism has been criticised for allowing extremism and unjust actions through law. It has also been suggested that positivism in its strictest sense is flawed because it ignores the depth and breadth of language in legal enactment, which means the positive law can be read in different lights based on differing meanings of the same word. Despite this, positivism has been seen as one of the fundamental legal theories in the development of modern legal philosophy over the last few decades, and is winning widespread favour through a contemporary academic revival.

Natural law and positivism have been the subject of an ongoing academic debate into the nature of law and its role within society. Both respective legal schools have criticised and built on one and others theories and principles to create a more sophisticated philosophical understanding of the legal construct. Although the debate is set to continue with a new generation of promising legal theorists, both natural law and positivism have gained widespread respect for their consistency and close analyses of the structure of law.

Posted in |